My research combines democratic theory, comparative party politics, and the history of political thought. I focus on early twentieth-century and contemporary debates about the shortcomings and potentials of representative institutions, particularly parties and party systems. My work explores the relationship between citizens and their elected representatives to contribute an alternative theory and practice of popular sovereignty that can deepen democracy and enhance its functionality.
Democratic theory
History of Political Thought
Italian Political Theory
Parties and partisanship
Political leadership and representation
Democratic Innovations
Institutional design
Memory Politics (WWII and post-war Europe)
Antonio Gramsci
Anti-Fascist Resistance
Scholars are increasingly interested in how collective memories of war and civil conflict shape competing conceptions of democracy. Less attention has been paid to the role of political parties as representative institutions that select and reinterpret the past to address present issues in the public sphere. This article contributes to this debate by theorizing what we call the public–party tension as a core challenge of democratic memory politics. We examine this tension through a comparative study of how the French and Italian Communist Parties instrumentalized or overlooked the last letters written by partisans of the anti-fascist resistance before their execution by Nazi and fascist forces during World War II. Drawing on excerpts from the Italian and French anthologies, we uncover an ethics of partisan memory that offers an alternative to both sectarian uses of the past and contemporary cosmopolitan, antagonistic, and agonistic modes of remembering World War II. We argue that these letters offer an enduring normative resource for democratic memory politics, showing how the legacy of anti-fascist resistance can help sustain a pluralist democracy today.
(Manuscript project)
Political parties are increasingly viewed as the main culprits of democratic erosion, elite capture and unresponsiveness, polarization, and declining citizens' participation. At the center of these concerns is the breakdown in the relationship between citizens and the core representative institutions of democracy, prompting renewed efforts to rethink and reform political parties. This project introduces Antonio Gramsci into the debate and brings his model of the mass party into dialogue with contemporary views of the party. Specifically, it reconstructs his account of the relationship between the party and the democratic ideal of popular sovereignty alongside competing perspectives within minimalist realist, Kelsenian proceduralist, radical democratic, and neo-republican thought. More concretely, the project proposes a Gramscian account of how political parties can be reformed in times of crisis to counter anti-democratic elites and oligarchic tendencies in representative government. I examine the institutional implications of his model of the mass party, focusing on how local party branches and the party's pedagogical function can overcome inequalities in power by increase citizens' participation and providing elected representatives with more reliable information about the public interest, thereby improving government accountability and strengthening democracy.
(Manuscript project)
The role of political parties in democracy has re-emerged as a major debate in democratic theory in response to the crisis of representation and the rise of authoritarian parties threatening democratic life. While some scholars regard parties as a necessary evil, others emphasize their democratic functions in regulating political conflict, enabling equal freedom, and promoting the common good. Yet what it means to be a partisan has rarely been examined from the perspective of women. This project addresses that gap by recovering a novel conception of the party and partisanship from the political writings of women in the European anti-fascist resistance, which I have translated from Italian into English. It identifies overlooked resources from twentieth-century women's political thought that challenge influential canonical theories of the relationship between political parties, political leadership, and popular sovereignty, from Machiavelli and the Italian Elite School to Kelsen, Schumpeter, and Gramsci. Despite their marginalization within dominant postwar narratives of the Resistance, these women articulated a vision of democratic freedom that simultaneously resisted fascist despotism, gender inequality, and other forms of anti-democratic exclusion. I argue that their writings expose the limitations of traditional representative institutions while offering alternative normative and practical resources for rethinking the party and what it means to be a partisan in a democracy.
This article will serve as the basis for my second book project, entitled Partisan Women of the Twentieth Century: Alternative Visions of Leadership, Partisanship, and Political Representation within the Anti-Fascist Tradition. The book examines the political thought of women in the anti-fascist resistance from diverse social classes, party affiliations, educational levels, faiths, languages, and national origins to reconstruct a coherent theory of partisanship, political leadership, and representation grounded in their common struggle for political freedom and gender equality. The project aims to develop, from within an overlooked tradition of political thought, an alternative institutional model of democratic representation and party organization that can address pressing challenges of elite unaccountability, declining citizens' participation, rising social and political inequality, and the dual threat of authoritarianism and oligarchy.
My work on party reform, institutional design, and democratic innovation spans across the subfields of contemporary democratic theory, empirical political science, and memory politics. I explore how parties should be internally structured and connected to grassroots organizations in order to better serve their role as regulators of conflict and facilitators of popular sovereignty. The aim of this research is to develop specific intra-party measures that improve the accountability of leaders to the citizenry and the public good.
(Article in prepration)
While citizens' engagement in political parties and other formal institutions has declined across many democracies, local level participation has increased around collective memories of historical injustices and competing narratives of national identity. From mass protests calling for the removal of Confederate monuments in the United States, to decades-long political divisions in Italy over Liberation Day (April 25) commemorating the anti-fascist resistance, memory conflicts remain a pressing issue in the public sphere. This project proposes a deliberative partisan approach to memory politics. It explores the role of political parties in mediating memory conflicts and facilitating healthy democratic debate and citizens' participation in determining how the past should be remembered. In particular, it investigates how novel institutional innovations within parties—such as intra-party deliberative assemblies on national holidays, monuments, and street-naming—can improve how citizens speak and listen to those with whom they disagree, thereby reducing polarization and ensuring political equality in the process of collective remembrance.